Skip to content

Hostname

viewcard.co.jp

Last fetched

viewcard.co.jp is a hostname indexed by WhisperGraph, the internet-infrastructure graph behind the Whisper Internet Directory. viewcard.co.jp is not listed on any threat feed indexed by WhisperGraph; reconciled level NONE.

Threat posture

0threat score (procedure-native scale)

NONE

No threats observed.

Threat feeds listing this
0
Verdict coverage
known-clean

Nutrition Label

WHISPER CANON · viewcard.co.jpRouting diversity0.0/10Peering density0.0/10MOAS conflict✓ noneThreat-feed listings10.0/10WHOIS transparency0.0/10Resolver footprint4.0/10canon.whisper.security/host/viewcard.co.jp

Resolution chain

No IPv4 resolution is recorded for viewcard.co.jp in WhisperGraph.

IPv6 resolution

No AAAA record for viewcard.co.jp is recorded in WhisperGraph.

WHOIS identity

WhisperGraph holds no WHOIS registrar, registrant organisation or contact email for viewcard.co.jp. WHOIS is recorded against the registrable domain, so a subdomain such as a www. host carries none of its own — check the registrable domain for this name.

Company

Company
Viewcard
Headquarters
Japan

Technology

Viewcard has been observed using 23 technologies somewhere in its estate. This is observed use, not an exposure finding. The 20 most widely adopted:

  • jQuery · javascript libraries
  • Google Analytics · intelligence and analytics
  • Priority Hints · performance
  • Nginx · web servers
  • Google Tag Manager · tag management
  • Google Search Console · performance
  • X-XSS-Protection · security
  • Facebook · social media analytics and monitoring
  • Facebook Pixel · analytics
  • Piwik PRO Core · consent management
  • Office 365 · communication and collaboration
  • DoubleClick Floodlight · advertising
  • Ruby · programming languages
  • Ruby on Rails · web frameworks
  • Microsoft Azure · cloud infrastructure computing
  • Google Analytics Enhanced eCommerce · analytics
  • Microsoft Clarity · analytics
  • TikTok Pixel · analytics
  • Microsoft Advertising · advertising
  • Apple iCloud Mail · email

Subdomains

Showing 2 of 2 subdomains (2 per page).

Web-graph footprint

Sampled `LINKS_TO` edges. The hyperlink layer is a pilot sample, not a web-scale crawl, so these are illustrative.

Mail and authentication

Nameservers

  • dns3.dion.ne.jp
  • dns1.jregroup.ne.jp
  • dns2.jregroup.ne.jp

MX records

  • mx1.hc662-93.ap.iphmx.com
  • mx2.hc662-93.ap.iphmx.com

SPF policy

  • ip: 124.146.170.8/32
  • ip: 124.146.170.9/32
  • exists: %{i}.spf.hc662-93.ap.iphmx.com
  • include: spf.protection.outlook.com
  • include: spf.jregroup.ne.jp

Threat-feed evidence

History

Related pages

Pivot from viewcard.co.jp into the addresses, networks and registries it depends on.

Queries

This hostname's full card — resolution chain, registration, mail policy, DNSSEC and mail authentication.


MATCH (h:HOSTNAME {name: $host})
OPTIONAL MATCH (h)-[:RESOLVES_TO]->(ip:IPV4)-[:ANNOUNCED_BY]->(ap:ANNOUNCED_PREFIX)
OPTIONAL MATCH (a:ASN)-[:ROUTES]->(ap)
OPTIONAL MATCH (a)-[:HAS_NAME]->(an:ASN_NAME)
OPTIONAL MATCH (ip)-[:LOCATED_IN]->(city:CITY)
OPTIONAL MATCH (ip)-[:HAS_COUNTRY]->(ipc:COUNTRY)
WITH h, ip, ap, a, an, city, ipc
LIMIT 20
WITH h,
     collect({ip: ip.name, prefix: ap.name, asn: a.name, network: an.name, city: city.name, country: ipc.name}) AS resolutions,
     collect(a.name) AS asnNames,
     collect(ap.name) AS prefixNames,
     collect(ap.isMoas) AS moasFlags,
     collect(ap.rpkiStatus) AS rpkiStatuses,
     head(collect(a)) AS primaryAsn,
     head(collect(ap)) AS primaryPrefix
OPTIONAL MATCH (primaryPrefix)-[:CONFLICTS_WITH]->(conflict:ASN)
WITH h, resolutions, asnNames, prefixNames, moasFlags, rpkiStatuses, primaryAsn,
     collect(conflict.name) AS conflictAsns
OPTIONAL MATCH (h)-[:HAS_REGISTRAR]->(reg:REGISTRAR)
OPTIONAL MATCH (h)-[:REGISTERED_BY]->(org:ORGANIZATION)
OPTIONAL MATCH (h)-[:CHILD_OF]->(tld:TLD)
WITH h, resolutions, asnNames, prefixNames, moasFlags, rpkiStatuses, primaryAsn, conflictAsns,
     collect(reg.name) AS registrars,
     collect(org.name) AS organizations,
     collect(tld.name) AS tlds
OPTIONAL MATCH (h)-[:HAS_EMAIL]->(em:EMAIL)
WITH h, resolutions, asnNames, prefixNames, moasFlags, rpkiStatuses, primaryAsn, conflictAsns,
     registrars, organizations, tlds,
     collect(em.name) AS emails
OPTIONAL MATCH (h)-[:HAS_PHONE]->(ph:PHONE)
WITH h, resolutions, asnNames, prefixNames, moasFlags, rpkiStatuses, primaryAsn, conflictAsns,
     registrars, organizations, tlds, emails,
     count(ph) AS phoneCount
OPTIONAL MATCH (h)<-[:MAIL_FOR]-(mx:HOSTNAME)
WITH h, resolutions, asnNames, prefixNames, moasFlags, rpkiStatuses, primaryAsn, conflictAsns,
     registrars, organizations, tlds, emails, phoneCount,
     collect(mx.name)[0..20] AS mxHosts
OPTIONAL MATCH (h)<-[:NAMESERVER_FOR]-(ns:HOSTNAME)
WITH h, resolutions, asnNames, prefixNames, moasFlags, rpkiStatuses, primaryAsn, conflictAsns,
     registrars, organizations, tlds, emails, phoneCount, mxHosts,
     collect(ns.name) AS nameservers
OPTIONAL MATCH (h)-[spf:SPF_A|SPF_EXISTS|SPF_INCLUDE|SPF_IP|SPF_MX|SPF_REDIRECT]->(spfTarget)
WITH h, resolutions, asnNames, prefixNames, moasFlags, rpkiStatuses, primaryAsn, conflictAsns,
     registrars, organizations, tlds, emails, phoneCount, mxHosts, nameservers,
     collect({mechanism: type(spf), target: spfTarget.name})[0..50] AS spf
OPTIONAL MATCH (h)-[:SIGNED_WITH]->(alg:DNSSEC_ALGORITHM)
WITH h, resolutions, asnNames, prefixNames, moasFlags, rpkiStatuses, primaryAsn, conflictAsns,
     registrars, organizations, tlds, emails, phoneCount, mxHosts, nameservers, spf,
     collect(alg.name) AS dnssecAlgorithms
OPTIONAL MATCH (h)-[:DMARC_REPORTS_TO]->(dm:DMARC_RECIPIENT)
WITH h, resolutions, asnNames, prefixNames, moasFlags, rpkiStatuses, primaryAsn, conflictAsns,
     registrars, organizations, tlds, emails, phoneCount, mxHosts, nameservers, spf, dnssecAlgorithms,
     collect(dm.name)[0..5] AS dmarcRecipients
OPTIONAL MATCH (h)-[:DKIM_SIGNED_BY]->(dk:VENDOR)
WITH h, resolutions, asnNames, prefixNames, moasFlags, rpkiStatuses, primaryAsn, conflictAsns,
     registrars, organizations, tlds, emails, phoneCount, mxHosts, nameservers, spf, dnssecAlgorithms,
     dmarcRecipients,
     collect(coalesce(dk.displayName, dk.name))[0..5] AS dkimVendors
OPTIONAL MATCH (h)-[:HAS_SIGNAL]->(hs:THREAT_SIGNAL_TYPE)
WITH h, resolutions, asnNames, prefixNames, moasFlags, rpkiStatuses, primaryAsn, conflictAsns,
     registrars, organizations, tlds, emails, phoneCount, mxHosts, nameservers, spf, dnssecAlgorithms,
     dmarcRecipients, dkimVendors,
     collect(hs.name) AS dnsSignals
CALL { WITH primaryAsn MATCH (primaryAsn)-[:BGP_NEIGHBOR]-(peer:ASN) RETURN count(peer) AS asnPeerCount }
RETURN h.name AS name,
       h.rank AS rank,
       h.verdictLevel AS verdictLevel,
       h.verdictScore AS verdictScore,
       h.verdictBlocking AS verdictBlocking,
       h.verdictCoverage AS verdictCoverage,
       h.verdictAdvisory AS verdictAdvisory,
       h.threatSources AS threatSources,
       h.threatFirstSeen AS threatFirstSeen,
       h.threatLastSeen AS threatLastSeen,
       h.isTor AS isTor,
       h.isVpn AS isVpn,
       h.isProxy AS isProxy,
       h.isC2 AS isC2,
       h.isPhishing AS isPhishing,
       resolutions, asnNames, prefixNames, moasFlags, rpkiStatuses, conflictAsns,
       registrars, organizations, tlds, emails, phoneCount, mxHosts, nameservers, spf,
       dnssecAlgorithms, dmarcRecipients, dkimVendors, dnsSignals,
       h.companyName AS companyName,
       h.companyIndustry AS companyIndustry,
       h.companyHqCountry AS companyHqCountry,
       h.companyHqCity AS companyHqCity,
       asnPeerCount
Run yourself →

The observed subdomain count, to depth 3.


MATCH (h:HOSTNAME {name: $host})
CALL { WITH h MATCH (h)<-[:CHILD_OF*1..3]-(sub:HOSTNAME) RETURN count(sub) AS subdomainCount }
RETURN subdomainCount
Run yourself →

Technologies the company behind this domain has been observed running, most widely adopted first.


MATCH (:HOSTNAME {name: $host})-[:RUNS_TECHNOLOGY]->(t:TECHNOLOGY)
WITH t.name AS name, t.category AS category, t.adopterCount AS adopters
ORDER BY adopters DESC, name
WITH collect({name: name, category: category}) AS technologies, count(*) AS total
RETURN total, technologies[0..20] AS technologies
Run yourself →

Peer companies (outbound SIMILAR_TO).

MATCH (:HOSTNAME {name: $host})-[:SIMILAR_TO]->(peer:HOSTNAME) RETURN peer.name AS host ORDER BY host LIMIT 8
Run yourself →

The parent company's domain and this company's domain portfolio (PARENT_OF).


MATCH (h:HOSTNAME {name: $host})
OPTIONAL MATCH (h)<-[:PARENT_OF]-(parent:HOSTNAME)
WITH h, collect({host: parent.name, company: parent.companyName})[0..3] AS parents
OPTIONAL MATCH (h)-[:PARENT_OF]->(child:HOSTNAME)
RETURN parents, collect({host: child.name, company: child.companyName})[0..10] AS portfolio
Run yourself →

Or query Whisper from your own LLM workflow via the Whisper MCP server.